14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (61%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2020 225/40 R18 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterCraft WP71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C rating. We also know where G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made - Romania/Poland.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Kumho WinterCraft WP71 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R16 - R19
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 54

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 11x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 6.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 28.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 12.55

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 2020

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

82%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

74%

Wet braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 87%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Wet handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 72%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 70%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 88%

Wet circle cornering

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

75%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Dry braking

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 84%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 74%

Dry handling

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 66%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

92%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

65%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 95%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 64%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 94%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 77%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 59%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 88%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 62%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

84%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

68%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 87%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 70%

Comfort

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 81%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 67%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

81%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

63%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 53%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 D

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80.5%

Kumho
WinterCraft WP71

0%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow
Best values in test	1-	2	1-
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	1-
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	2-	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2019 225/45 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2+	2-	1-	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Conditionally recommended	2+	3+	2	3
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Rating: Satisfactory	2-	2-	2	2+
Show test details

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Stopping distance on wet	Stopping distance on snow
Best values in test	32,2	25,9
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2	35,1	25,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP71	34,8	29,2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP71

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands