18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52 (2026)

2 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Kumho (71%). In this particular case, the BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has a better rating of 82% compared to 65% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the WinterCraft WP52 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (95%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP52 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and WinterCraft WP52 is made in Korea.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Number of tests
23
10
Best position
#1
#2
Average position
6.7
12.2
Latest test
2025
2024
Available sizes
109
144

Performance comparison

Averaged from 2 tests

Wet Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
72%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
62%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
78%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
61%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
88%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
53%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
81%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
46%
Dry Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
69%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Dry Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
88%
Snow Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
84%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
67%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
85%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
64%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
77%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
72%
Snow Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
82%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
83%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
59%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
79%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Ride Comfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
60%
Economy
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
70%
BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
63%
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52
Rolling Resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
73%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
57%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
66%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52
69%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AUTOBILDAUTOBILD
Winter
2024205/55 R16View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2022215/55 R17View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.