14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Snow
Ice
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (83%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Winter i*cept evo2 W320 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 has B wet grip rating, whereas 85% of Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 has C rating. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Winter i*cept evo2 W320 is made in Hungary.

#	BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 /84%	Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 /0%

Dimensions	R14 - R19	R15 - R22
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Premium

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Upper-middle

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 124

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91

Number of tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 21x

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 9x

Best position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 1.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 5.

Worst position in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 13.

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 20.

Average position in tests

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 6.19

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 7.44

Year of the last test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 2023

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 2019

Best rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Very good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Good

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 Still recommended

Wet

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

73%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

70%

Wet braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 76%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 68%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Wet handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 73%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 85%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 79%

Wet circle cornering

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 B

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 C

Dry

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

83%

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

73%

Dry braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 75%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 72%

Dry handling

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 67%

Dry steering response

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 90%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 78%

Dry lane changing

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 80%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 65%

Snow

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

93%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

88%

Snow traction

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 91%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 88%

Snow braking

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 92%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

Snow handling

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 85%

Snow cornering

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 87%

Comfort

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

79%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

75%

Exterior noise

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 84%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

Comfort

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 86%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 79%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 ?

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 ?

Costs

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

77%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

68%

Rolling resistance

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 73%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 65%

Mileage

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 75%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 64%

Price/value

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 66%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 0%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 E

2. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 E

Ice

(Overall rating)

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2

80%

Hankook
Winter i*cept evo2 W320

80%

Ice braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320 82%

2. BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 80%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Winter tyre test 2017 225/50 R17

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Running costs
Best values in test	2+	2+	1	2+
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 Rating: Good	2	2-	1	2
Hankook Winter icept evo2 W320 Rating: Satisfactory*	2-	2	3+	2
Show test details

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Hankook Winter i*cept evo2 W320

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Rankings

Tests

Brands