Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Nokian zLine Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian zLine
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, BFGoodrich summer tyres are slightly better rated (66%) than Nokian (62%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2015 when was the Nokian zLine first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich Advantage dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian zLine also have A wet ratings.
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage
| Nokian zLine
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R16 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
1. Nokian zLine 20.
Average position in tests
1. Nokian zLine 7.382. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nokian zLine Recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian zLine Recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Aquaplaning - cross
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Wet braking
1. Nokian zLine 90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
1. Nokian zLine 83%
Wet circle cornering
2. Nokian zLine 60%
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
1. Nokian zLine 85%
Dry handling
1. Nokian zLine 93%
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
1. Nokian zLine 75%
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
1. Nokian zLine 90%
