Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage
| Nokian WetProof
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
If you are stuck choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre and the Nokian WetProof tyre, we are here to help you make an informed decision by comparing their overall test results and strengths/weaknesses. The BFGoodrich Advantage has an 80% overall rating, while the Nokian WetProof has a slightly better score with 87%.
First, let’s examine the BFGoodrich Advantage tyre. According to test results, this tyre performed better in fuel efficiency in the ADAC test, with a 9th position out of 15. It also showcased strong dry handling and dry handling in the Autobild test, ranking 18th out of 53 tyres tested. However, the BFGoodrich Advantage our rating did not rank as high in other tests, such as Autozeitung, GTÜ, and Firmenauto.
On the other hand, the Finnish-made Nokian WetProof tyre demonstrated a better overall performance in the tests. It ranked higher in noise and wet circle cornering in the ADAC test, with a 11th position out of 15 tyres. The WetProof also showed exceptionally good results in GTÜ and Firmenauto tests, placing 2nd in both with top features like wet circle cornering, wet handling, wet handling (objective), wet side guide, and exterior noise. It even ranked 6th in Autozeitung and AutoBild tests.
A summary of Nokian WetProof's strengths (autumn 2017) include its effectiveness, balanced performance, and good wet and dry traction. The tyre's weaknesses lie in its environmental balance, wear life, abrasion, and sustainability.
In conclusion, our verdict for both tyre's overall strengths and weaknesses are as follows:
- BFGoodrich Advantage
- Strengths: Fuel Efficiency, Dry Handling
- Weaknesses: Overall medioćre test results compared to Nokian WetProof
- Nokian WetProof
- Strengths: Noise, Wet Circle Cornering, Wet Handling, Exterior Noise
- Weaknesses: Environmental Balance, Wear Life, Abrasion, Sustainability
When choosing between the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Nokian WetProof tyres, the WetProof appears to be better overall, ranking higher in most categories with slightly better ratings. However, it is crucial to consider specific tests relevant to your driving needs when making a decision.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nokian WetProof 5.642. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,9 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 2,9 | 2,0 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 146 | 134 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Sufficient | 108 | 108 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Good | 124 | 114 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | Running costs | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 157 | 68 | 54 | 22 | 20 | ||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Recommended | 144 | 58 | 50 | 19 | 17 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 66 | 50 | 19 | 18 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,9 | 8,9 | 8,7 | 10 | 10 | ||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 7,6 | 8,0 | 7,5 | 7 | 7 | ||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Good | 8,2 | 8,5 | 7,6 | 7 | 10 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,7 | 31,9 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Satisfactory | 2,9 | 2,2 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
