Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Nexen N Fera Primus Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Nexen N Fera Primus
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Nexen). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Nexen summer tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than BFGoodrich (40%). In this particular case, the Nexen N Fera Primus has a better rating of 80% compared to 76% of the BFGoodrich Advantage. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich Advantage was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Nexen N Fera Primus first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Advantage and the N Fera Primus were tested. See more mutual tests below.
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage | Nexen N Fera Primus | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R15 - R19 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Nexen N Fera Primus 12.672. BFGoodrich Advantage 12.75
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
2. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nexen N Fera Primus Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet handling
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | |||||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,4 | 25,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 37,4 | 29,1 | |||||
| Nexen N fera Primus | 37,2 | 27,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2,8 | 2,9 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Good | 3,1 | 2,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2- | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Nexen N Fera Primus | 37,2 | 28,6 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||