Segment
1. BFGoodrich Advantage Upper-middle2. Fulda SportControl 2 Lowcost
Comparison: BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Fulda SportControl 2
Table of contents:
| # | BFGoodrich Advantage
| Fulda SportControl 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R20 | R17 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
We're comparing two summer tyres: the BFGoodrich Advantage and the Fulda SportControl 2.
The BFGoodrich Advantage, manufactured by BFGoodrich, had an overall rating of 68%. A significant strength of this tyre is its comfort. During the Autobild test which included 51 tyres, it secured the 20th position. The other strengths were the tyre's stable driving behavior and short braking distances on dry tracks highlighted in autobild 2022's summarised text. However, the tyre had some weaknesses too, including understeering handling behavior and extended braking distances in wet conditions.
In comparison, the Fulda SportControl 2, manufactured by Fulda, earned a higher rating at 74%. It achieved a better position than the BFGoodrich tyre in the Autobild test, securing the 13th place out of 51 tyres. The Fulda SportControl 2's strengths were its excellent performance during aquaplaning tests, short braking distances on both wet and dry tracks, and a good price-performance ratio. However, one downside was the significantly delayed steering response and mediocre mileage, as reviewed in autobild 2022's summarised text.
In the mutual tests, the Fulda SportControl 2 came out on top overall, thanks to its better performance and higher overall rating. Both tyres, however, performed well and had their unique strengths. The BFGoodrich tyre stood out for its comfort and stable driving behaviour on dry surfaces, while the Fulda's highlights were its aquaplaning reserves and a good price-performance ratio.
In conclusion, if comfort and stable driving behaviour on dry surfaces are your priorities, the BFGoodrich Advantage would be a suitable choice. However, if you are interested in a tyre with good aquaplaning reserves, short braking distances on all surfaces and a more favourable price-performance ratio, then the Fulda SportControl 2 could be an excellent choice for you.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Fulda SportControl 2 11.072. BFGoodrich Advantage 13.62
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Fulda SportControl 2 Satisfactory2. BFGoodrich Advantage Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32.6 | 27.4 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36.2 | 31.9 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36.2 | 33.9 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 2+ | 1+ | ||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2- | ||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 35,7 | 27,5 | |||||
| BFGoodrich Advantage | 36,3 | 31 | |||||
| Fulda SportControl 2 | 36,5 | 29,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
