18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER vs. Continental VanContact Winter (2026)

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Continental winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). But when it comes to comparing BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER and Continental VanContact Winter, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER was done in 2019, compared to 2018 when was the Continental VanContact Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the ACTIVAN WINTER and the VanContact Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental VanContact Winter also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental
VanContact Winter
Number of tests
1
2
Best position
#13
#1
Average position
13.0
1.0
Latest test
2019
2019
Available sizes
15
48

Performance comparison

Wet Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
49%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
83%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Wet Braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
40%
Continental VanContact Winter
87%
Wet Handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
23%
Continental VanContact Winter
90%
Wet Circle Cornering
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
61%
Continental VanContact Winter
83%
Aquaplaning Longitudinal
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
56%
Continental VanContact Winter
78%
Aquaplaning Cross
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
67%
Continental VanContact Winter
78%
Dry Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
82%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Dry Braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
82%
Continental VanContact Winter
82%
Snow Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
68%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
77%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Snow Braking
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
78%
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
Snow Traction
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
72%
Continental VanContact Winter
83%
Snow Handling
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
53%
Continental VanContact Winter
80%
Ice Performance
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
86%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Ice Braking Abs
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
86%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Ice Lateral Guidance
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
86%
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Comfort & Noise
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
66%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
69%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Noise Exterior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
71%
Continental VanContact Winter
67%
Noise Interior
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
60%
Continental VanContact Winter
71%
Economy
Confidence
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
90%
BFGoodrich
ACTIVAN WINTER
Continental VanContact Winter
74%
Continental
VanContact Winter
Fuel Efficiency
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
91%
Continental VanContact Winter
80%
Mileage
BFGoodrich ACTIVAN WINTER
89%
Continental VanContact Winter
67%

Performance spider chart

Tests used in comparison

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2019205/65 R16View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.