• 14 shops, 56 847 products

Comparison: BF Goodrich g-force Winter vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (93%) than BF (75%). But when it comes to comparing BF Goodrich g-force Winter and Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Goodrich g-force Winter and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below.

# BF Goodrich g-force Winter
/0%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
/0%

Add to comparison

BF
Bridgestone
DimensionsR14 - R18 R14 - R21
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test1-22+1
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
32-21-
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: -
23+2+ 1-
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
BF Goodrich g-force Winter39,426,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00138,525,9
Show test details
ADAC
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test2,32,11,72,02,81,51,5
BF Goodrich g-force Winter
Rating: -
3,92,62,22,23,61,5 1,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
Rating: -
2,52,1 3,32,43,72,02,1
Show test details
Autobild
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test36,827,7
BF Goodrich g-force Winter42,928,8
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-00143,428,1
Show test details