Segment
1. Barum Polaris 3 Lowcost2. Goodride SW601 Lowcost
Comparison: Barum Polaris 3 vs. Goodride SW601
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum) against a tyre from a manufacturer from (Goodride). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Goodride (7%). But when it comes to comparing Barum Polaris 3 and Goodride SW601, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Barum Polaris 3 was done in 2015, compared to 2016 when was the Goodride SW601 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2016 205/55 R16 test, where both the Polaris 3 and the SW601 were tested.
| # | Barum Polaris 3
| Goodride SW601
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R18 | R13 - R15 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Barum Polaris 3 10.6
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Barum Polaris 3 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 25 | |||||
| Barum Polaris 3 | 37,2 | 26,1 | |||||
| Goodride SW601 | 38,5 | 29,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
