Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost2. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Taiwan (Kenda). Generally, Kenda summer tyres are slightly better rated (59%) than Apollo (47%). In this particular case, the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 has a better rating of 69% compared to 56% of the Apollo Alnac 4G. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G was done in 2015, compared to 2023 when was the Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2023 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G and the Kenetica Pro KR210 were tested.
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G | Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Apollo Alnac 4G ? dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Costs
(Overall rating)Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| Kenda Kenetica Pro KR210 Rating: Good | 3,0 | 2,4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||