Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Lowcost
Comparison: Apollo Alnac 4G vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
Table of contents:
| # | Apollo Alnac 4G
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R14 - R17 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Apollo Alnac 4G and Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 are two tyres that have been tested across various parameters and conditions. Despite both being summer tyres, the performance and rating detail considerable differences.
Talking about the Apollo Alnac 4G, according to our testing, it scores an average rating of 46%. It exhibited efficiency as a plus point in the 'Autobild 2020' test. However, the tyre showed various flaws such as being unbalanced, with weaknesses on dry and wet pavement. It also had a comparatively low environmental balance and sustainability rate and a relatively low mileage, resulting in high wear and tear. According to the 'ADAC' and 'Autobild' comparison tests, it scored the 6th and 21st position out of 15 and 53 tyres, respectively.
On the other hand, the successor to the previously successful Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2, stands out as a better performer. Our testing gave it a remarkably high rating of 84%. The 'ADAC' and 'Autobuild' tests marked it at the 4th and 13th positions out of 15 and 53 tyres, respectively. Its strengths included commendable mileage, excellent price/value ratio, and a comfortable driving experience, as appreciated in the 'Autobild' test. Currently, there's no newer model available that replaces this tyre.
To sum it up, the Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 outperforms the Apollo Alnac 4G in all aspects. With superior test ratings and features, it proves to be a dependable choice. However, it's always advisable to consider personal preferences and requirements when choosing tyres.
For more tire comparisons and reviews, visit our Goodyear and Apollo manufacturer pages.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Apollo Alnac 4G 18.88
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Exemplary2. Apollo Alnac 4G Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Satisfactory2. Apollo Alnac 4G Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Enviromental impact | Driving safety | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,3 | 1,8 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Good | 3,5 | 3,0 | |||||
| GoodYear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,1 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Apollo Alnac 4G | 36,8 | 33,2 | |||||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 | 36,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Apollo Alnac 4G Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 2,0 | |||
| Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 0,6 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
