Segment
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (85%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 has a better rating of 96% compared to 65% of the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2023 when was the GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the UltraGrip Performance 3 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R14 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost
1. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Test winner
2. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 Recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance 3 | 36.9 | 29.4 | |||||
Show test details |