Segment
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from India (Apollo) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Czech Republic (Barum). Barum is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Barum winter tyres are slightly better rated (63%) than Apollo (57%). In this particular case, the Apollo Alnac 4G Winter has a better rating of 65% compared to 63% of the Barum Polaris 5. The first tyre test of Apollo Alnac 4G Winter was done in 2024, compared to 2019 when was the Barum Polaris 5 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the AUTOBILD 2024 205/55 R16 test, where both the Alnac 4G Winter and the Polaris 5 were tested. See more mutual tests below.
# | Apollo Alnac 4G Winter
| Barum Polaris 5
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R16 | R13 - R19 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Lowcost2. Barum Polaris 5 Lowcost
2. Barum Polaris 5 15.15
1. Barum Polaris 5 Good
2. Barum Polaris 5 Sufficient
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2+ | 2+ | 1 | 2+ | |||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2 | 2 | |||
Barum Polaris 5 Rating: Satisfactory | 3 | 3+ | 3 | 2 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34.6 | 28.9 | |||||
Apollo Alnac 4G Winter | 36.4 | 30.6 | |||||
Barum Polaris 5 | 37.7 | 30.0 | |||||
Show test details |