Segment
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Premium2. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost
Comparison: Accelera Phi-R vs. Michelin Primacy 3
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Accelera) against a tyre from a manufacturer from France (Michelin). Generally, Michelin summer tyres are slightly better rated (79%) than Accelera (0%). But when it comes to comparing Accelera Phi-R and Michelin Primacy 3, the rating is the same - 0%. The first tyre test of Accelera Phi-R was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Michelin Primacy 3 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Phi-R and the Primacy 3 were tested.
| # | Accelera Phi-R
| Michelin Primacy 3
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Michelin Primacy 3 Recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Accelera Phi-R | 38,5 | 44 | |||||
| Michelin Primacy 3 | 34,6 | 38,58 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
