Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Accelera Phi-R Lowcost
Comparison: Accelera Phi-R vs. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from (Accelera) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Hankook summer tyres are slightly better rated (76%) than Accelera (0%). The first tyre test of Accelera Phi-R was done in 2017, compared to 2016 when was the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the Phi-R and the Ventus Prime3 K125 were tested.
| # | Accelera Phi-R
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125
| Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R15 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 34,6 | |||||
| Accelera Phi-R | 38,5 | 44 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,3 | 35,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
