Avon ZV7 is a summer tyre made in total of 279 sizes, ranging from R13 to R13 - this particular dimension is R16, which means it fits to a 16 inch/406.4mm diameter wheel. 205/75 R16 is 55mm wider than the narrowest dimension (150) and 70mm narrower than the widest one (275). This tyre profile of 75 means the sidewall height of the tyre is 75% of the tyre width (205mm), which results in 153.75mm sidewall height. In 205/75 R16, there is only one possible speed index for Avon ZV7 - "R", which is good for speeds up to 170 km/h. In 205/75 R16, ZV7 usually competes against N blue HD Plus, which is a tyre from Nexen with a rating of 0%, compared to 17% of the Avon in question.
Relevant tyre tests in same or similiar dimension (205/75 R16)
ADAC Summer tyre test 2023 205/55 R16 sufficient Ranked #42 of 50The Avon ZV7 ranked 42 out of 50 in its performance, receiving a final rating of "Sufficient". Despite being relatively economical in fuel consumption, the tire was criticized for its unbalanced nature, notably its shortcomings on dry surfaces which led to its downgrading. Furthermore, it was marked down for its poor environmental footprint, predominantly due to its very low mileage, high wear, and sustainability weaknesses. In terms of driving safety, the tire's performance on dry roads offered just sufficient feedback and control, making it challenging for drivers to accurately gauge and maintain the necessary steering angle through turns. This often required mid-maneuver corrections, and the vehicle showed a tendency to oversteer during evasive actions, making it difficult to control. However, its braking distance was considered good relative to other tested tires. On wet surfaces, the Avon ZV7 narrowly missed a good rating, with commendable performance in braking and aquaplaning tests, yet only achieving satisfactory results in lateral aquaplaning and wet handling. It exhibited a moderate level of grip and a tendency to understeer or oversteer, suggesting a satisfactory combination of longitudinal and lateral forces. The environmental assessment highlighted the tire's significant abrasion and predicted low mileage, contributing to a sufficient rating despite a moderately low fuel consumption that did not fully compensate for its increased weight and efficiency concerns.