Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Vredestein summer tyres are slightly better rated (55%) than Kumho (54%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 77% compared to 70% of the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Ecsta PS71 were tested.
| # | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
| Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3 | 2- | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||