18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Vredestein Ultrac Pro vs. Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Vredestein (62%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 93% compared to 79% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Pro was done in 2024, compared to 2026 when was the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Auto Bild 2026 255/45 R19 test, where both the Ultrac Pro and the Potenza Sport Evo were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Number of tests
11
7
Best position
#3
#1
Average position
7.2
4.6
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
90
105

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 27 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Dry braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Dry handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Wet
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
90%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Wet braking
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
94%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Wet handling
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
95%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
98%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Comfort
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Exterior noise
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Costs
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Rolling resistance
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Mileage
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Price Mileage Ratio
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
84%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Other
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
96%
Gesamtnote
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
96%
Offroad
Confidence
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
93%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
93%
Handling on gravel
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
100%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Grass traction
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
94%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Gravel traction
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Sand traction
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Auto BildAuto Bild
Summer
2026255/45 R19View
SportscarsSportscars
Summer
2026255/35 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.