Segment
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental). Generally, Continental allround tyres are slightly better rated (74%) than Kumho (65%). In this particular case, the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 has a better rating of 85% compared to 64% of the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S. The first tyre test of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S was done in 2020, compared to 2023 when was the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2023 225/45 R17 test, where both the HA32 Solus 4S and the AllSeasonContact 2 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Kumho HA32 Solus 4S dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the HA32 Solus 4S is made in China and AllSeasonContact 2 is made in Czech Republic.
# | Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
| Continental AllSeasonContact 2
| Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R13 - R20 | R15 - R21 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Upper-middle
2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S 10.78
1. Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Exemplary2. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
1. Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 37.7 | 45 | |||||
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S | 41.4 | 49.8 | |||||
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | 40.4 | 45.4 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S Rating: Satisfactory | |||||||
Continental AllSeasonContact 2 Rating: Exemplary | |||||||
Show test details |