18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. BF Goodrich Advantage 2 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BF). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than BF (69%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 86% compared to 67% of the BF Goodrich Advantage 2. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2026 when was the BF Goodrich Advantage 2 first tested.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecsta PS71
BF
Goodrich Advantage 2
Number of tests
15
3
Best position
#2
#5
Average position
9.0
14.3
Latest test
2025
2026
Available sizes
216
292

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 3 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
97%
Dry braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
99%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
100%
Dry handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
94%
Wet
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
94%
Aquaplaning - cross
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
100%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
90%
Wet braking
Kumho Ecsta PS71
99%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
99%
Wet handling
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
88%
Comfort
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
95%
Exterior noise
Kumho Ecsta PS71
76%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
95%
Costs
Confidence
Kumho Ecsta PS71
93%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
97%
Mileage
Kumho Ecsta PS71
100%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
95%
Rolling resistance
Kumho Ecsta PS71
86%
BF Goodrich Advantage 2
98%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.