18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Kumho Ecowing ES31 vs. Debica Presto HP2 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Debica (59%). The first tyre test of Kumho Ecowing ES31 was done in 2022, compared to 2021 when was the Debica Presto HP2 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Ecowing ES31 and the Presto HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 57% of Kumho Ecowing ES31 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (94%) of the Debica Presto HP2 also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

Kumho
Ecowing ES31
Debica
Presto HP2
Number of tests
1
5
Best position
#9
#4
Average position
9.0
12.8
Latest test
2022
2024
Available sizes
89
16

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Costs
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Dry
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
77%
Comfort
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2022215/60 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.