Segment
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 vs. Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R22 | R18 - R23 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 are two standout summer tyres from experienced tyre manufacturers, Hankook and Yokohama. Each tyre features its unique strengths and weaknesses.
The Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, a summer tyre, offers unparalleled value for money combined with a commendable wet grip, and efficient low energy use. The first choice equipment for models like the Audi Q8, Audi SQ8, Porsche Cayenne, and BMW X3, this Hankook tyre is a standout option. However, the tyre scored negatively on steering response and aquaplaning resistance in tests. Still, it was able to secure 1st position in the "Autobild" test that included 50 tyres. It was most lauded for its excellent dry and wet braking. More about Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127.
On the other hand, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 is a summer tyre that was recognized for its thrilling and sporty driving experience, quick steering, and unparalleled dry handling. Despite being a fun and dynamic tyre, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 struggled with stopping in wet conditions and wasn't as comfortable with potholes. It had a high rolling resistance and took a while to warm up, hindering its performance in cooler climates. In the "Autobild" test, it secured the 4th position and was most praised for its superior dry braking. More about Yokohama Advan Sport V107.
Overall, both Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 and Yokohama Advan Sport V107 fared strongly in tests, each displaying their unique strengths and weaknesses. However, if we were to pick a winner based on overall performance and feedback, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 holds an edge for its excellent value for money and more well-rounded performance. However, the Yokohama Advan Sport V107 will not disappoint those seeking a sporty drive and excellent dry handling.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Satisfactory
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | ||||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Recommended | 1 | ||||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Rating: - | 1 | ||||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3- | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Yokohama Advan Sport V107 | 58.9 | 25.4 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||