Segment
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Premium2. Nokian WetProof Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 vs. Nokian WetProof
Table of contents:
| # | Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | Nokian WetProof | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R20 | R14 - R20 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
In the competitive world of tyres, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Nokian WetProof summer tyres have both proven to be successful choices. In this comparison, we will take a look at their performance in various tyre tests and determine their strengths and weaknesses
The Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 comes with an 88% rating and is the OEM tyre for Citroën C3 Aircross. Manufactured in Hungary, this tyre was designed for a balance between performance and comfort. Although it has been replaced by the Hankook Ventus Prime 4, the K125 still offers good value for money. Hankook is known for producing high-quality tyres at affordable prices.
On the other hand, the Nokian WetProof is a Finnish-made tyre with an 87% rating. Marketed as a tyre specifically designed for wet conditions, it provides excellent grip and safety on wet roads. Nokian is well-regarded for its innovative and technologically-advanced tyres.
When comparing their performance in various tests, we can see some variations:
In the ADAC test (15 tyres in total), the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 ranked 7th, excelling in wet circle cornering. The Nokian WetProof placed 11th, performing well in noise and wet circle cornering.
The Autobild test had a larger sample of 53 tyres. Here, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 took the 1st position, standing out for its dry braking, dry handling, and wet braking performance. Nokian WetProof ranked 6th in this test.
In the ACE test (9 tyres), the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 placed at 7th, showcasing its dry driving behavior and exterior noise performance. However, the Nokian WetProof took the 1st position, excelling in wet braking, wet handling, and wet handling – objective results.
Lastly, in the AutoMotorSport test (11 tyres), the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 settled at the 6th position, doing well in dry braking, dry handling, dry handling – objective, and dry lane changing. The Nokian WetProof took the lead again, ranking 1st with great performance in dry braking, dry handling – objective, dry lane changing, exterior noise, and wet braking.
In summary, while the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 generally offers balanced performance, its main strengths lie in dry conditions. The Nokian WetProof, on the other hand, truly lives up to its name, excelling in wet conditions and providing superior grip and safety. When it comes to overall test ranking, the Nokian WetProof tends to rank higher and showcase more consistent performance across different tests.
Depending on your driving needs and preferences, both the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 and the Nokian WetProof are excellent options. If you prioritize performance in dry conditions, the Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 is worth considering. However, for those who value wet grip and overall consistency, the Nokian WetProof stands out as an optimal choice.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Nokian WetProof 5.64
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Exemplary2. Nokian WetProof Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WetProof Recommended2. Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet handling
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet side guide
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WetProof 68 dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,1 | 1,5 | 2,4 | 1,0 | 1,2 | ||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | 1,8 | ||
| Nokian Wetproof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,2 | 2,7 | 2,5 | 2,6 | ||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Good | 1- | 1- | 3+ | ||||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 | 34,1 | 29,6 | |||||
| Nokian Wetproof | 35,1 | 31,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1,8 | 1,4 | 2,7 | 0,6 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,7 | 1,5 | 2,9 | 2,5 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 3,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | Running costs | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 153 | 66 | 51 | 19 | 10 | 17 | |
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 143 | 51 | 49 | 16 | 10 | 17 | |
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Highly recommended | 153 | 66 | 45 | 17 | 8 | 17 | |
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Enviromental impact | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 8,8 | 9,1 | 9,3 | 9,7 | |||
| Hankook Ventus Prime3 K125 Rating: Recommended | 8,3 | 7,8 | 9,3 | 6,9 | |||
| Nokian WetProof Rating: Recommended | 8,8 | 9,0 | 9,0 | 6,5 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||