18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Debica Presto HP2 vs. Kumho Ecowing ES31 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Poland (Debica) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (70%) than Debica (59%). The first tyre test of Debica Presto HP2 was done in 2021, compared to 2022 when was the Kumho Ecowing ES31 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2022 215/60 R16 test, where both the Presto HP2 and the Ecowing ES31 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 93% of Debica Presto HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (57%) of the Kumho Ecowing ES31 also have B wet ratings.

Test Profile

Debica
Presto HP2
Kumho
Ecowing ES31
Number of tests
5
1
Best position
#4
#9
Average position
12.8
9.0
Latest test
2024
2022
Available sizes
16
89

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
72%
Costs
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
71%
Comfort
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
73%
Dry
Confidence
Debica Presto HP2
77%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2022215/60 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.