18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Continental VanContact 200 vs. Nokian cLine VAN (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (88%) than Nokian (69%). But when it comes to comparing Continental VanContact 200 and Nokian cLine VAN, the rating is the same - 0%. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 215/65 R16 test, where both the VanContact 200 and the cLine VAN were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 77% of Continental VanContact 200 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Nokian cLine VAN also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Continental
VanContact 200
Nokian
cLine VAN
Number of tests
1
1
Best position
#5
#4
Average position
5.0
4.0
Latest test
2019
2019
Available sizes
29
16

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Wet
Confidence
Nokian cLine VAN
72%
Comfort
Confidence
Nokian cLine VAN
76%
Costs
Confidence
Nokian cLine VAN
68%
Dry
Confidence
Nokian cLine VAN
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2019215/65 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.