Segment
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Continental) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Continental summer tyres are slightly better rated (84%) than Kumho (66%). In this particular case, the Continental PremiumContact 6 has a better rating of 90% compared to 79% of the Kumho Ecsta PS71. The first tyre test of Continental PremiumContact 6 was done in 2017, compared to 2018 when was the Kumho Ecsta PS71 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the PremiumContact 6 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 89% of Continental PremiumContact 6 dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (79%) of the Kumho Ecsta PS71 also have A wet ratings. We also know where PremiumContact 6 is made - Slovakia/Germany/Czech Republic.
# | Continental PremiumContact 6 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
![]() | ![]() | ||
Dimensions | R15 - R22 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Premium2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.55
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Exemplary2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Recommended
1. Continental PremiumContact 6 Recommended2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 2,1 | 2,1 | 3,1 | 2,0 | |||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 1 | 2 | 3- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 | 33,2 | 30,2 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 34,9 | 29 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1,7 | 1,3 | 2,8 | 2,0 | 1,6 | ||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Good | 1,7 | 2,4 | 3,6 | 2,0 | 2,1 | ||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,3 | 2,4 | 3,3 | 3,0 | 2,0 | ||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2 | 1 | ||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2- | 3- | ||||
Show test details |
Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
Continental PremiumContact 6 | 35,8 | 29,9 | |||||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 | 37,1 | 31,6 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | Rolling resistance | Noise | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 150 | 55 | 39 | 14 | 7 | ||
Continental PremiumContact 6 Rating: Recommended | 145 | 63 | 48 | 18 | 7 | ||
Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Recommended | 149 | 67 | 44 | 14 | 9 | ||
Show test details |