18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Vredestein Ultrac Pro (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Netherlands (Vredestein). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Vredestein (62%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 93% compared to 79% of the Vredestein Ultrac Pro. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2024 when was the Vredestein Ultrac Pro first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Auto Bild 2026 255/45 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Ultrac Pro were tested. See more mutual tests below.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Vredestein
Ultrac Pro
Number of tests
7
11
Best position
#1
#3
Average position
4.6
7.2
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
105
90

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 27 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
95%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
94%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
99%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
98%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
95%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
88%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
89%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
97%
Mileage
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
82%
Price Mileage Ratio
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
77%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
84%
Other
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
96%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Gesamtnote
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
96%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
96%
Offroad
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
93%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
93%
Handling on gravel
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
100%
Grass traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
97%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
94%
Gravel traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
87%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
79%
Sand traction
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
88%
Vredestein Ultrac Pro
99%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 4 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
Auto BildAuto Bild
Summer
2026255/45 R19View
SportscarsSportscars
Summer
2026255/35 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View
AutobildAutobild
Summer
2026245/45 R19View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.