18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (89%) than Hankook (85%). In this particular case, the Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo has a better rating of 93% compared to 61% of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129. The first tyre test of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo was done in 2026, compared to 2022 when was the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the TYRE REVIEWS 2026 235/35 R19 test, where both the Potenza Sport Evo and the Ventus S1 evo Z K129 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (88%) of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129 also have A wet ratings.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
Potenza Sport Evo
Hankook
Ventus S1 evo Z K129
Number of tests
7
4
Best position
#1
#5
Average position
4.6
6.0
Latest test
2026
2026
Available sizes
105
32

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
92%
Dry braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
92%
Dry handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
91%
Dry handling - objective
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
94%
Wet
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
93%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
95%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
100%
Wet braking
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
93%
Wet circle cornering
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
79%
Wet handling
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
83%
Wet handling - objective
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
94%
Comfort
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
98%
Comfort
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
100%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
90%
Exterior noise
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
94%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
100%
Costs
Confidence
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
100%
Rolling resistance
Bridgestone Potenza Sport Evo
92%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo Z K129
100%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual Tests Available
These tyres were tested together in 2 test(s). Click to view detailed head-to-head results.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
TYRE REVIEWSTYRE REVIEWS
Summer
2026235/35 R19View
SportscarsSportscars
Summer
2026255/35 R19View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.