18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: Bridgestone M788 vs. GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (GoodYear). Generally, GoodYear winter tyres are slightly better rated (94%) than Bridgestone (90%). When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 75% of Bridgestone M788 has C wet grip rating, whereas 89% of GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 has B rating.

Test Profile

Bridgestone
M788
GoodYear
Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
Number of tests
29
Best position
#1
Average position
4.0
Latest test
2026
Available sizes
11
198

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
33%
Dry handling
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
81%
Dry braking
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
65%
Wet
Confidence
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
64%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
81%
Wet braking
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
80%
Comfort
Confidence
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
57%
Exterior noise
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
66%
Comfort
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
83%
Interior noise
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
71%
Costs
Confidence
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
72%
Rolling resistance
GoodYear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3
69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.