18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Generally, Bridgestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (90%) than BFGoodrich (75%). The first tyre test of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2017 225/50 R17 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 and the Blizzak LM-001 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (72%) of the Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001 also have B wet ratings. If you wonder where the tyres in question are made, the G-FORCE WINTER 2 is made in Romania/Poland and Blizzak LM-001 is made in Poland.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-001
Number of tests
23
15
Best position
#1
#4
Average position
6.7
7.9
Latest test
2025
2018
Available sizes
109
147

These tyres were not tested together. The comparison below is inferred from separate tests by normalizing both tyres against 9 shared benchmark tyres, so treat it as an estimate.

Dry
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
Dry braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
Dry handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
Dry handling - objective
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
Wet
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
Aquaplaning - cross
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
90%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
Wet braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
87%
Wet handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
93%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
95%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
Wet handling - objective
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
Wet circle cornering
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
97%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
Snow
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
Snow braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
97%
Snow handling
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
96%
Snow traction
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
Snow handling - objective
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
94%
Ice
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
Ice braking
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
Ice lateral guidance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
95%
Comfort
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
84%
Exterior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
99%
Interior noise
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
67%
Noise/Komfort
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
86%
Costs
Confidence
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
96%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
Rolling resistance
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
87%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
98%
Mileage
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
98%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
Price/value
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
100%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
100%
Fuel efficiency
BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2
99%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-001
93%

Performance spider chart

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View
AutobildAutobild
Winter
2017225/50 R17View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.