18 shops · 56 ·847+ products

Comparison: BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV vs. Sava Eskimo HP2 (2026)

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (BFGoodrich) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). BFGoodrich is a brand that belongs to the Michelin group. Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, BFGoodrich winter tyres are slightly better rated (75%) than Sava (62%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV and the Eskimo HP2 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of BFGoodrich G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV has B wet grip rating, whereas 54% of Sava Eskimo HP2 has C rating.

Test Profile

BFGoodrich
G-FORCE WINTER 2 SUV
Sava
Eskimo HP2
Number of tests
1
15
Best position
#2
#6
Average position
2.0
15.5
Latest test
2017
2025
Available sizes
42
29

These tyres were not tested together in the same test. The scores below are aggregated from different independent tests, so direct comparison should be taken with caution.

Dry
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
71%
Dry braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
69%
Dry driving behavior
Sava Eskimo HP2
74%
Snow
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
78%
Snow braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Snow traction
Sava Eskimo HP2
82%
Snow handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Wet
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
63%
Aquaplaning - cross
Sava Eskimo HP2
67%
Wet braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
66%
Wet handling
Sava Eskimo HP2
60%
Costs
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
83%
Mileage
Sava Eskimo HP2
76%
Comfort
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
72%
Exterior noise
Sava Eskimo HP2
62%
Ice
Confidence
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%
Ice braking
Sava Eskimo HP2
85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Winter
2017215/65 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison

TheTireLab.com

GET

TheTireLab.com

Compare tyres, read test results and find the best prices — all in one app.