Segment
1. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Premium2. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Premium
Comparison: Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 vs. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127
Table of contents:
| # | Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | R17 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
This article compares two UUHP summer tyres, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 and the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127, to provide an overview of their features based on recent test results. Taking into consideration the strengths and weaknesses of each tyre, as well as their overall performance in mutual tests. Both tyres are products of renowned manufacturers, with Dunlop and Hankook being well-known for their high quality and performance products.
In Autobild tests, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 outperformed the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 with a third place out of 53 tested tyres, whereas the Dunlop tyre secured the 11th position. The Hankook tyre excelled in dry braking and wet braking categories, marking it as one of the best all-rounders in this test. The Dunlop tyre showcased reliable and safe driving properties on wet surfaces and good aquaplaning prevention but suffered from slightly delayed steering response on dry surfaces.
The Autozeitung test witnessed both tyres placed closely, with the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 achieving the 8th position out of 10, just ahead of the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 in the 9th position. The Dunlop tyre again exhibited its expertise in aquaplaning performance, both cross and longitudinal, and added a low rolling resistance to its list of pros. However, the Hankook tyre showed average performance in this test compared to its competitors.
Gathering all the test data, we can conclude the following:
Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 - strengths: safe driving properties on wet surfaces, good aquaplaning prevention, short dry braking distances, and low rolling resistance. Weaknesses: delayed steering response on dry surfaces.
Our rating: 85%
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 - strengths: convincing driving performance, agile handling, short braking distances on both wet and dry surfaces. Weaknesses: below-average tread wear leading to shorter tyre lifespan.
Our rating: 87%
In conclusion, the Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 outperforms the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 overall, especially in braking performance on both dry and wet surfaces. However, the Hankook tyre's shorter lifespan could be a drawback for some drivers. On the other hand, the Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 provides reliable and safe driving properties on wet surfaces and good aquaplaning prevention.
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Exemplary2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Highly recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Satisfactory2. Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Still recommended
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Mileage
Price/value
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2+ | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2 | 2- | 2- | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 61.8 | 27 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 58.1 | 24.8 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 80 | 78 | 83 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 78 | 69 | 87 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1- | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2- | 2 | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Satisfactory | 2+ | 2+ | 3+ | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 32,1 | 28,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 34,3 | 33 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 34,7 | 30,3 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Wet | Dry | Running costs | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 Rating: Good | 2- | 2+ | 2 | ||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 Rating: Exemplary | 2+ | 1- | 2 | ||||
| Show test details | |||||||
| Name | Stopping distance on dry | Stopping distance on wet | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 34,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Dunlop SP Sport MAXX RT2 | 35,4 | 31,4 | |||||
| Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 K127 | 35,2 | 28,7 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||