All tests: Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3
| Organization | Rank | Dimension | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| Automotorsport | 6. | 195/55 R16 | 2026 |
| # | Name | Rating | Price | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | Continental AllSeasonContact 2 | Very good |
8.7
|
8.8
|
8.5
|
7.7
|
9.7
|
Reliable and forgiving on snow; very convincing on dry and especially wet roads; test-best energy efficiency and lowest rolling resistance.
|
Relatively weak aquaplaning protection and some lateral tread scrub near the cornering limit.
|
Continental won through a strong wet-and-dry balance and the best environmental result, while remaining less dominant on snow.
|
£115 87 H + 2 | |
| 2. | Vredestein Quatrac | Very good |
8.2
|
8.9
|
8.1
|
7.8
|
7.3
|
Balanced and controllable on snow; shortest wet braking distance and easy wet handling; agile steering with stable emergency-lane-change behaviour; price-performance recommendation.
|
Longer dry braking distance and reduced ride comfort because of limited self-damping.
|
Vredestein finished second with the best wet result and the editorial value recommendation.
|
£83 87 H + 1 | |
| 3. | Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF3 | Very good |
8.0
|
7.8
|
8.6
|
8.8
|
6.9
|
Test-best winter-road behaviour, strong aquaplaning resistance and the shortest dry braking distance.
|
Somewhat longer wet braking, limited noise and damping comfort, and high rolling resistance and energy use.
|
Pirelli took third as the snow specialist, backed by strong dry performance but weaker wet and environmental results.
|
£112 91 V | |
| 4. | Nokian Seasonproof 2 | Good |
7.9
|
7.3
|
8.6
|
8.4
|
7.9
|
Very safe and dynamic on winter roads; strong aquaplaning resistance, strong overall performance and very low exterior noise.
|
Deficits in wet braking and wet cornering grip.
|
Nokian ranked fourth with a winter-oriented balance and strong dry performance, but a less competitive wet score.
|
£91 87 H + 1 | |
| 5. | Bridgestone Turanza All Season 6 | Good |
7.6
|
7.2
|
8.8
|
6.8
|
8.0
|
The sportiest tyre in the test in summer-dry conditions, with secure behaviour and above-average comfort.
|
Comparatively weak on snow and wet roads, and somewhat sensitive to load changes in dry corners.
|
Bridgestone was the dry specialist but lost ground on snow and, to a lesser extent, in the wet.
|
£93 91 H + 1 | |
| 6. | Uniroyal AllSeasonExpert 3 | Good |
7.5
|
7.7
|
7.1
|
7.6
|
7.3
|
Balanced, relatively active behaviour on snow; adequate safety in moderate rain; good ride comfort and the lowest listed price.
|
Long dry braking, a slightly nervous rear in rapid lane changes, and limited aquaplaning protection.
|
Uniroyal offered a consistent mid-field result and the lowest sampled price, without leading a category.
|
£82 91 H + 1 | |
| 7. | Hankook Kinergy 4S2 H750 | Good |
7.2
|
7.0
|
8.2
|
8.2
|
5.6
|
Secure snow braking and strong static cornering grip on snow.
|
Heavy understeer in dynamic snow handling; long wet braking and limited wet-corner reserves; weak damping, loud running and the highest rolling resistance.
|
Hankook performed strongly on snow and dry roads, but the environmental score pulled down its total.
|
£96 87 V + 2 | |
| 8. | Kleber Quadraxer 3 | Good |
7.1
|
6.2
|
7.2
|
8.2
|
7.9
|
Dependable and forgiving, with relatively short braking on snow and dry asphalt and the joint-lowest exterior noise.
|
Long wet braking; slow responses, pronounced understeer, limited reserves and weak feedback in corners.
|
Kleber combined good snow and environmental performance with a pronounced wet-road limitation.
|
£95 87 H + 3 | |
| 9. | Falken EuroALL Season AS210 | Good |
7.1
|
6.5
|
7.5
|
7.7
|
7.3
|
Secure and controllable on snow, with relatively short dry braking and the second-lowest listed price.
|
Long wet braking, weak wet grip and aquaplaning protection, audible cabin noise and below-average ride comfort.
|
Falken remained good overall and affordable in the price sample, but its wet result held it back.
|
£87 87 V + 1 | |
| # | Name | - | Rating | Points total | Wet | Dry | Snow | Enviromental impact | Positive features | Neagative features | Price |
