Looking for a comparison of Vredestein Quatrac Pro to tyres that are made in similar dimensions? Here you can find detailed information based on tests, reviews and manufacturer's data.
Vredestein has long been one of Holland's most respected tyre makers, and the Quatrac family sits at the heart of its passenger car range. The Quatrac Pro and its successor, the Quatrac Pro+, occupy neighbouring positions in the same all-season lineup — both premium, both made in Hungary, both spanning 17- to 22-inch fitments. The reason Vredestein offers both comes down to philosophy: the Pro earned a reputation as a wet-weather specialist, while the Pro+ was developed to deliver more balanced, everyday competence at a friendlier price point. Choosing between them means deciding which side of that trade-off matters more to you.
The Quatrac Pro is the wet-weather weapon of the pair. Across multiple independent tests, it consistently delivered the shortest wet braking distances and the fastest wet handling times of any all-season tyre in its class — a feat that earned it top billing from Tyre Reviews in 2022 and strong praise from German testers for its precise, confidence-inspiring behaviour on rain-soaked roads. Interior cabin noise is another genuine strength: reviewers consistently note how quiet the Pro is, and measured scores back that up. On dry roads it handles well for an all-season — Autobild 2021 highlighted its precise turn-in — though dry braking is a relative weak point. Snow performance is modest rather than impressive, aquaplaning resistance is lower than rivals, and rolling resistance is on the high side. Real owners on a Ford Fiesta ST200 and a Subaru Forester appreciated the dry feedback and were pleasantly surprised by light-snow capability, while a Seat Ateca owner called it a clear upgrade over OE Bridgestone fitments. Available in 96 dimensions, it covers the mainstream SUV and saloon market well.
The Quatrac Pro+ was designed to address a different brief: a more rounded, accessible all-season that competes on value without sacrificing the Vredestein badge quality. Autobild's 2025 test labelled it the most affordable branded tyre on test, praising its balanced showing on both wet and dry roads. Where the original Pro is a wet specialist, the Pro+ aims for consistency across conditions — it edges the Pro on snow braking scores and matches it in aquaplaning resistance, while keeping dry performance respectable. The trade-off is that outright wet grip is noticeably lower than its predecessor, and exterior noise is higher. One BMW 520d owner covering city and motorway miles found it very quiet (replacing worn Michelin RFTs, so context matters), and a Mazda MX-5 driver on mountain roads described it as sticky and precise with a sporty character. With 102 dimensions — six more than the Pro — it covers a broader spread of vehicle fitments, making it easier to specify for less common sizes.
Without a direct head-to-head test between the two, the comparison rests on their respective test archives — and the gap on wet roads is the most striking finding. The Quatrac Pro averaged 88.7 in wet braking across ten tests, versus 72 for the Pro+ across three; wet handling follows a similar pattern, 90.4 against 81.3. On dry roads the Pro also leads, averaging 85.6 in dry handling versus 73 for the Pro+. Snow results are closer — both testers flag modest rather than strong winter capability, and the Pro+'s snow braking average of 68 is marginally better than the Pro's 66.4, though snow traction slightly favours the Pro. Autobild 2025 specifically noted the Pro+'s weakness in lateral aquaplaning and snow cornering, which mirrors the Pro's own historical criticism in those same areas. The picture that emerges is clear: the Quatrac Pro is the stronger performer wherever roads are wet, while the Pro+ trades some of that peak grip for a lower purchase price and a wider size portfolio.
Day-to-day living with either tyre reveals a few meaningful differences. The Quatrac Pro scores considerably better on interior noise — a score of 88 versus 73.5 for the Pro+ — which matters on long motorway runs. Comfort scores are also slightly in the Pro's favour. Rolling resistance is similarly unimpressive on both, so fuel economy is not a deciding factor either way; neither carries an EV-specific designation, though both cover sizes relevant to electrified SUVs. The Pro+ has a broader range of 102 dimensions against 96 for the Pro, which can be decisive if your car takes a niche fitment. On price, Autobild's framing of the Pro+ as the budget-friendly brand option suggests it should cost less at point of sale — a genuine advantage for drivers who want the Vredestein name without the Pro's premium. Mileage data for the Pro averages 67.7 across three tests, and no comparable wear data exists yet for the Pro+.
If wet safety is your priority — and for most European drivers it should be — the Quatrac Pro is the stronger choice. Its lead in wet braking and wet handling is substantial and backed by years of independent testing; it is also quieter, making it the more refined daily companion. The Quatrac Pro+ earns its place for drivers who want balanced all-season capability at a lower outlay, or whose vehicle requires a size not available in the Pro range. It is a competent, honest tyre — Autobild's description of it as the most affordable premium brand option is a fair one — but it cannot match the Pro's wet-road confidence. In short: choose the Pro if you drive in rain-heavy climates or prioritise refinement; choose the Pro+ if budget or fitment availability is the deciding factor.
1. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Premium2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro+ Premium3. Continental AllSeasonContact Premium4. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Premium6. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Lowcost7. Nexen N fera Sport Lowcost8. Viking Protech NewGen Lowcost9. Avon ZV7 Lowcost
1. Avon ZV7 313
7. Avon ZV7 8.
8. Avon ZV7 42.
8. Avon ZV7 18.559. Viking Protech NewGen 32.71
1. Continental AllSeasonContact Exemplary2. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Exemplary3. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Exemplary4. Nexen N fera Sport Exemplary5. Michelin CrossClimate 2 Test winner8. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Satisfactory9. Avon ZV7 Satisfactory
3. Nexen N fera Sport Satisfactory4. Viking Protech NewGen Satisfactory5. Nexen N Blue 4 Season 2 Satisfactory6. Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO Conditionally recommended7. Vredestein Quatrac Pro Conditionally recommended8. Continental AllSeasonContact Sufficient9. Avon ZV7 Sufficient
6. Avon ZV7 74%
2. Avon ZV7 85%
1. Avon ZV7 79%
8. Avon ZV7 60%
7. Avon ZV7 74%
6. Avon ZV7 75%
2. Avon ZV7 88%
7. Avon ZV7 0%
7. Avon ZV7 0%
7. Avon ZV7 0%
7. Avon ZV7 0%
3. Avon ZV7 82%
7. Avon ZV7 0%
9. Avon ZV7 0%
4. Avon ZV7 69%
8. Avon ZV7 55%
7. Avon ZV7 25%
