Segment
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Holland (Vredestein) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Bridgestone). Generally, Bridgestone summer tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Vredestein (56%). In this particular case, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R has a better rating of 70% compared to 58% of the Bridgestone Potenza S001. The first tyre test of Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R was done in 2018, compared to 2015 when was the Bridgestone Potenza S001 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 245/30 R20 test, where both the Ultrac Vorti R and the Potenza S001 were tested.
# | Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R | Bridgestone Potenza S001 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R19 - R21 | R17 - R20 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Premium2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Premium
1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Exemplary2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Satisfactory
2. Bridgestone Potenza S001 Conditionally recommended
Name | Wet | Dry | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | |||||
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R Rating: Exemplary | 2 | 2+ | |||||
Bridgestone Potenza S001 Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2 | |||||
Show test details |