Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Upper-middle2. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost
Comparison: Sava TRENTA M+S vs. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Yokohama (43%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the BluEarth winter WY01 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 has B rating.
| # | Sava TRENTA M+S | Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Sava TRENTA M+S 73 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Yokohama BluEarth winter WY01 Rating: Conditionally recommended | 4,2 | 3,2 | 3,0 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,5 | 2,0 |
| Show test details | |||||||