Segment
1. Sava TRENTA M+S Lowcost2. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Lowcost
Comparison: Sava TRENTA M+S vs. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Sava winter tyres are slightly better rated (61%) than Matador (40%). Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 205/65 R16 test, where both the TRENTA M+S and the MPS530 Sibir Snow Van were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 71% of Sava TRENTA M+S dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van also have C wet ratings.
| # | Sava TRENTA M+S | Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R15 - R16 | R14 - R16 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Worst rating in test
1. Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Outside noise accoring to EU label
2. Sava TRENTA M+S 73 dB
Dry
(Overall rating)Costs
(Overall rating)Fuel consumption according to EU label
Ice
(Overall rating)Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,4 | 2,3 | 2,2 | 2,3 | 2,5 | 2,0 | 1,6 |
| Sava TRENTA M+S Rating: Not recommended | 2,7 | 4,1 | 4,7 | 2,8 | 3,3 | 2,5 | 2,2 |
| Matador MPS530 Sibir Snow Van Rating: Conditionally recommended | 3,2 | 4,1 | 2,6 | 2,8 | 3,8 | 3,0 | 2,6 |
| Show test details | |||||||