Segment
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle2. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Lowcost
Comparison: Nokian WR Snowproof P vs. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Switzerland (Esa-Tecar). Generally, Esa-Tecar winter tyres are slightly better rated (57%) than Nokian (52%). In this particular case, the Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro has a better rating of 60% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Nokian WR Snowproof P was done in 2021, compared to 2020 when was the Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro first tested.
| # | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R17 - R21 | ||
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Esa-Tecar Super Grip Pro Satisfactory2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow braking
Snow traction
Snow cornering
Snow handling
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Comfort
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB