Segment
1. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli summer tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Nokian (58%). In this particular case, the Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 has a better rating of 93% compared to 71% of the Nokian Powerproof. The first tyre test of Nokian Powerproof was done in 2019, compared to 2017 when was the Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autozeitung 2021 225/40 R18 test, where both the Powerproof and the P ZERO PZ4 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Nokian Powerproof dimensions has A wet grip rating. Most (58%) of the Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 also have A wet ratings. We also know where Powerproof is made - Finland.
# | Nokian Powerproof | Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R17 - R20 | R17 - R24 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Premium2. Nokian Powerproof Upper-middle
2. Nokian Powerproof 7.45
1. Nokian Powerproof Exemplary2. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Highly recommended
1. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Recommended2. Nokian Powerproof Conditionally recommended
1. Nokian Powerproof 72 dB
Name | Points total | Wet | Dry | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 92 | 93 | 93 | ||||
Nokian Powerproof | 85 | 83 | 87 | ||||
Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 Rating: Highly recommended | 88 | 89 | 87 | ||||
Show test details |