Segment
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovakia (Matador) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Japan (Yokohama). Matador is a brand that belongs to the Continental group. Generally, Yokohama winter tyres are slightly better rated (43%) than Matador (40%). In this particular case, the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 has a better rating of 52% compared to 37% of the Matador MP92 Sibir Snow. The first tyre test of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow was done in 2015, compared to 2018 when was the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 first tested. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2019 225/45 R17 test, where both the MP92 Sibir Snow and the BluEarth winter V905 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Matador MP92 Sibir Snow dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (100%) of the Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 also have C wet ratings.
# | Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R18 | R15 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Upper-middle2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Lowcost
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
1. Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Satisfactory2. Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Satisfactory
Name | Stopping distance on wet | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 29,2 | ||||||
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow | 34,8 | ||||||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 | 32,5 | 26 | |||||
Show test details |
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Running costs | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 1- | 2+ | 1 | 1 | |||
Matador MP92 Sibir Snow Rating: Satisfactory | 3+ | 2- | 2- | 2- | |||
Yokohama BluEarth winter V905 Rating: Satisfactory | 2 | 2+ | 3+ | 2- | |||
Show test details |