Segment
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Upper-middle2. Nokian WR Snowproof P Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho WinterCraft WP71 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof P
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Finland (Nokian). Generally, Nokian winter tyres are slightly better rated (52%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has a better rating of 54% compared to 50% of the Nokian WR Snowproof P. The first tyre test of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 was done in 2016, compared to 2021 when was the Nokian WR Snowproof P first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 100% of Kumho WinterCraft WP71 has C wet grip rating, whereas 100% of Nokian WR Snowproof P has B rating.
| # | Kumho WinterCraft WP71 | Nokian WR Snowproof P | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R19 | R17 - R21 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P Satisfactory2. Kumho WinterCraft WP71 Conditionally recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Snow
(Overall rating)Snow handling
Snow traction
Snow braking
Snow cornering
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Comfort
(Overall rating)Comfort
Exterior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Nokian WR Snowproof P 70 dB