• 10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Kumho HA32 Solus 4S vs. Michelin CrossClimate+

# Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
/73%
Michelin CrossClimate+
/71%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R20 R13 - R19
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

In this article, we will compare two popular all-round tyres, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S and the Michelin CrossClimate+, based on their performance in various tests conducted by Autobild. Both tyres have been assessed for their strengths and weaknesses, with consideration for their mutual test positions and overall performance. Links to each tyre and their respective manufacturers, Kumho and Michelin, are provided for more information.


Kumho HA32 Solus 4S


The Kumho HA32 Solus 4S is an all-round tyre with a rating of 76%. Made in China, this tyre boasts strong performance in some areas but falls short in others. In the Autobild tests, the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S secured the 10th position out of 32 tyres. Some of its standout features include aquaplaning - longitudal, exterior noise, and stability in dry handling. However, it received criticism for its performance on snow, slightly understeering wet handling, and increased rolling resistance.


Autobild 2021: Plus: Gute Sicherheitsreserven bei Aquaplaning, stabiles Trockenhandling. Minus: Nur befriedigende Fahreigenschaften auf Schnee, leicht untersteuerndes Nasshandling, erhöhter Rollwiderstand.


Autobild 2020: Plus: Gute Fahreigenschaften bei jeder Witterung, gute Zugkraft und kurze Bremswege auf Schnee, dynamisches Nass- und Trockenhandling. Minus: Geringe Laufleistung, hoher Rollwiderstand, befriedigendes Preis-Leistungs-Verhältnis.


Michelin CrossClimate+


The Michelin CrossClimate+ is another all-round tyre with an impressive rating of 87%. In the Autobild tests, the Michelin CrossClimate+ outperformed the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S, clinching the 5th position out of 32 tyres. The tire's strengths lie in its comfort, snow traction, dry braking, exterior noise, and rolling resistance. It showed a slight weakness in cornering aquaplaning, but its overall performance deemed it a premium all-season tyre with well-rounded capabilities.


Autobild 2021: Plus: Bewährtes Allseason-Profil mit ausgewogenem hohen Leistungspotenzial, gute Schneetraktion, stabiles Fahrverhalten mit guter Lenkpräzision, kurze Nassbremswege. Minus: Leichte Schwäche beim Kurvenaquaplaning.


Autobild 2020: Plus: Premium-Ganzjahresreifen mit ausgewogenen Leistungen bei jeder Witterung, dynamische Handlingqualitäten, präzises Lenkverhalten, hohe Kilometerleistung, niedriger Rollwiderstand. Minus: Hohes Preisniveau.


Verdict


In summary, though the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S delivers decent performance in some areas, it falls short in terms of snow handling and rolling resistance. On the other hand, the Michelin CrossClimate+ stands out as a more balanced option, offering better overall performance in various weather conditions, making it the more suitable choice for drivers seeking a well-rounded all-season tyre. However, it is important to note that the Michelin CrossClimate+ comes with a higher price tag compared to the Kumho HA32 Solus 4S.

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name WetDrySnow
Best values in test12+1
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
22-3+
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary
22+ 2+
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowRunning costs
Best values in test12+11
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S
Rating: Satisfactory
222+3
Michelin CrossClimate+
Rating: Exemplary
21-2+1-
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on dryStopping distance on wet
Best values in test39,745
Kumho HA32 Solus 4S44,349,3
Michelin CrossClimate+39,7 49,7
Show test details