Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Upper-middle
Comparison: Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Kumho PorTran KC53
Both of the tyres in this comparison are made by Kumho, which is a brand from South Korea. In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 77% compared to 30% of the Kumho PorTran KC53. The first tyre test of Kumho Ecsta PS71 was done in 2018, compared to 2019 when was the Kumho PorTran KC53 first tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 79% of Kumho Ecsta PS71 has A wet grip rating, whereas 93% of Kumho PorTran KC53 has C rating.
| # | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Kumho PorTran KC53 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 | | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R22 | R14 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.33
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended2. Kumho PorTran KC53 Sufficient
Wet
(Overall rating)Wet handling
Aquaplaning - cross
Wet braking
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet circle cornering
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Dry driving behavior
Offroad
(Overall rating)Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB