Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Sava Eskimo S3+

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Hankook) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Slovenia (Sava). Sava is a brand that belongs to the GoodYear group. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Sava (61%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 has a better rating of 68% compared to 46% of the Sava Eskimo S3+. The first tyre test of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 was done in 2016, compared to 2015 when was the Sava Eskimo S3+ first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2019 185/65 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS2 W452 and the Eskimo S3+ were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 90% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (83%) of the Sava Eskimo S3+ also have C wet ratings. We also know where Winter i*cept RS2 W452 is made - Korea.

#	Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 /68%	Sava Eskimo S3+ /46%	Add to comparison Make Model New comparison

Dimensions	R13 - R17	R13 - R16
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452

/68%

Sava Eskimo S3+

/46%

Add to comparison

Make

Model

New comparison

Dimensions

R13 - R17

R13 - R16

Price

Set dimension to see prices

Remove

Remove from comparison

Segment

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Premium

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Lowcost

Number of sizes available

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 88

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 33

Number of tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 21x

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 5x

Best position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2.

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 3.

Worst position in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 20.

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 21.

Average position in tests

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 7.1

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 12.2

Year of the last test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 2020

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 2019

Best rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Highly recommended

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Satisfactory

Worst rating in test

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 Satisfactory

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ Conditionally recommended

Dry

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo S3+
89%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
71%

Dry driving behavior

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 100%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 72%

Snow

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
75%

Sava
Eskimo S3+
60%

Snow traction

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 61%

Wet

(Overall rating)

Sava
Eskimo S3+
82%

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
70%

Wet circle cornering

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 83%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 73%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 62%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 78%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 62%

Wet braking

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 83%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 73%

Wet handling

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 89%

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 73%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ ?

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
82%

Sava
Eskimo S3+
77%

Exterior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 91%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 86%

Interior noise

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 80%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 74%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Sava Eskimo S3+ 68 dB

2. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 72 dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
76%

Sava
Eskimo S3+
73%

Mileage

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 78%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 78%

Fuel efficiency

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 75%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 68%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 ?

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ ?

Ice

(Overall rating)

Hankook
Winter i*cept RS2 W452
72%

Sava
Eskimo S3+
66%

Ice braking

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 71%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 63%

Ice lateral guidance

1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 74%

2. Sava Eskimo S3+ 69%

Add to comparison

Mutual tests

ADAC Winter tyre test 2019 185/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	2,1	1,9	2,2	2,6	1,5	1,6
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Recommended*	2,1	2,5	2,5	2,6	2,9	2,0	2,6
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Conditionally recommended	2,8	3,6	1,9	2,3	2,7	2,0	2,0
Show test details

ADAC Winter tyre test 2017 195/65 R15

Name	Wet	Dry	Snow	Ice	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,8	1,7	1,7	2,1	3,0	1,5	1,7
Hankook Winter icept RS2 W452 Rating: Satisfactory*	2,6	2,2	2,7	2,5	3,7	2,5	2,2
Sava Eskimo S3+ Rating: Satisfactory	2,9	3,3	1,9	2,4	3,5	2,5	2,2
Show test details

Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS2 W452 vs. Sava Eskimo S3+

Add to comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Summer

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Winter

Rankings

Tests

Brands

Allround

Rankings

Tests

Brands