Segment
1. Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 Premium2. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Upper-middle
Comparison: Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Table of contents:
In this comparison, both of the tyres are made by a brand from South Korea. Generally, Hankook winter tyres are slightly better rated (71%) than Kumho (48%). In this particular case, the Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 has a better rating of 61% compared to 47% of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2015 185/60 R15 test, where both the Winter i*cept RS W442 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 70% of Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.
| # | Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R13 - R15 | R13 - R17 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho WinterCraft WP51 Sufficient
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Stopping distance on wet | Stopping distance on snow | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 36,8 | 27,7 | |||||
| Hankook Winter i*cept RS W442 | 41,6 | 28,5 | |||||
| Kumho WinterCraft WP51 | 42,5 | 30,2 | |||||
| Show test details | |||||||