10 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 vs. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti

Table of contents:

Summary
Wet
Dry
Costs
Mutual tests
Dimensions and prices
Buy %

#	GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 /90%	Vredestein Ultrac Vorti /55%

Dimensions	R17 - R22	R17 - R24
Price	Set dimension to see prices	Set dimension to see prices
Remove	Remove from comparison	Remove from comparison

The following text compares the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 and the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti summer tyres. Both tyres have been extensively tested and reviewed, with results from Autobild, ADAC, and Gute-Fahrt available for further analysis.

The GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is a high-performance tyre with a 94% rating, making it a top choice for many drivers. It has since been replaced by the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 6. This tyre excels in various areas such as price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. It is manufactured in Slovenia and Germany by Goodyear, a well-known tyre company.

The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, on the other hand, is another summer tyre option with a slightly lower rating of 87%. Manufactured in the Netherlands by Vredestein, this tyre shines in areas like wet braking, wet handling, and exterior noise. The tyre has not yet been replaced by a newer model.

In the Autobild test, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 outperformed the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti, ranking 1st out of 53 tyres. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti placed 9th, making it a credible alternative. The Asymmetric 5 demonstrated its strengths in price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti showcased its abilities in aquaplaning resistance, wet braking, wet handling, wet side guide, and dry handling.

When compared in the ADAC test, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 maintained its superiority by ranking 3rd out of 16 tyres, with its best feature being mileage. In contrast, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti placed 7th in the test with strengths in mileage and exterior noise.

The Gute-Fahrt test saw the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 securing the 2nd position out of 10 tyres, while the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti came in last at the 10th position, with wet braking as its standout feature.

In summary, the GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 is the clear winner in terms of overall performance and test results. Its strengths are found in price/value, wet handling, aquaplaning resistance, and mileage. Meanwhile, the Vredestein Ultrac Vorti is a decent alternative, especially for those valuing wet performance and reduced exterior noise. However, it falls short in comparison to the Asymmetric 5 in terms of overall test rankings and performance.

Segment

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Premium

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Premium

Number of sizes available

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 162

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 69

Number of tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 15x

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 13x

Best position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 1.

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 3.

Worst position in test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 6.

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 12.

Average position in tests

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2.33

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 6.62

Year of the last test

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 2022

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 2020

Best rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Exemplary

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Exemplary

Worst rating in test

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Good

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Good

Wet

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
86%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 85%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 84%

Aquaplaning - cross

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 87%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 81%

Wet braking

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 82%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 76%

Wet handling

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 93%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 90%

Wet circle cornering

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 88%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 80%

Wet braking according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 ?

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Dry

(Overall rating)

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
86%

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74%

Dry braking

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 85%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 81%

Dry handling

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 92%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 90%

Offroad

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
92%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
?

Comfort

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
75%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
72%

Exterior noise

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 72%

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 69%

Outside noise accoring to EU label

1. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ? dB

2. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 ? dB

Costs

(Overall rating)

GoodYear
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
71%

Vredestein
Ultrac Vorti
56%

Rolling resistance

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 61%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 30%

Mileage

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 85%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 61%

Price/value

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 76%

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti 57%

Fuel consumption according to EU label

1. GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 ?

2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti ?

Add to comparison

Make

Model

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Running costs
Best values in test	1	1-	1
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Exemplary	1-	2+	1
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Exemplary	2+	1-	2
Show test details

Autobild Summer tyre test 2020 245/45 R18

Name	Stopping distance on dry	Stopping distance on wet
Best values in test	32,1	28,7
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5	33,2	30,8
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti	33,4	31,3
Show test details

ADAC Summer tyre test 2020 225/40 R18

Name	Wet	Dry	Noise	Wear	Fuel consumption
Best values in test	1,7	1,3	2,8	2,0	1,6
GoodYear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Rating: Good	2,3	1,7	3,1	2,0	1,9
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti Rating: Satisfactory	2,7	2,5	2,9	2,0	2,4
Show test details