Segment
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Upper-middle2. Giti Premium H1 Lowcost
Comparison: Giti Premium H1 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71
Table of contents:
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Singapore (Giti) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Giti is a brand that belongs to the GT group. Generally, Kumho summer tyres are slightly better rated (54%) than Giti (42%). In this particular case, the Kumho Ecsta PS71 has a better rating of 77% compared to 51% of the Giti Premium H1. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2021 225/50 R17 test, where both the Premium H1 and the Ecsta PS71 were tested. We also know where Premium H1 is made - China.
| # | Giti Premium H1 | Kumho Ecsta PS71 | Add to comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
 |  | ||
| Dimensions | R16 - R18 | R16 - R22 | |
| Price | |||
| Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
Number of sizes available
Number of tests
Best position in test
Worst position in test
Average position in tests
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 9.332. Giti Premium H1 10.5
Year of the last test
Best rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Highly recommended2. Giti Premium H1 Satisfactory
Worst rating in test
1. Kumho Ecsta PS71 Conditionally recommended2. Giti Premium H1 Still recommended
Wet
(Overall rating)Aquaplaning - cross
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Wet braking
Wet circle cornering
1. Giti Premium H1 100%
Wet handling
Wet braking according to EU label
Dry
(Overall rating)Dry braking
Dry handling
Comfort
(Overall rating)Exterior noise
Interior noise
Outside noise accoring to EU label
1. Giti Premium H1 ? dB2. Kumho Ecsta PS71 ? dB
Costs
(Overall rating)Rolling resistance
Fuel consumption according to EU label
Add to comparison
Dimensions and prices
Mutual tests
| Name | Wet | Dry | Noise | Wear | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best values in test | 2,0 | 1,5 | 2,6 | 1,5 | |||
| Giti Premium H1 Rating: Satisfactory | 3,3 | 1,8 | 3,0 | 2,5 | |||
| Kumho Ecsta PS71 Rating: Good | 2,2 | 2,5 | 3,2 | 2,0 | |||
| Show test details | |||||||