Segment
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from Germany (Fulda) against a tyre from a manufacturer from Italy (Pirelli). Generally, Pirelli winter tyres are slightly better rated (68%) than Fulda (55%). In this particular case, the Fulda Kristall Control HP2 has a better rating of 76% compared to 53% of the Pirelli Scorpion Winter. The first tyre test of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 was done in 2017, compared to 2015 when was the Pirelli Scorpion Winter first tested. Important for this comparison is also the ADAC 2017 215/65 R16 test, where both the Kristall Control HP2 and the Scorpion Winter were tested. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 60% of Fulda Kristall Control HP2 dimensions has B wet grip rating. Most (53%) of the Pirelli Scorpion Winter also have B wet ratings.
# | Fulda Kristall Control HP2 | Pirelli Scorpion Winter | Add to comparison |
---|---|---|---|
Dimensions | R15 - R19 | R16 - R22 | |
Price | |||
Remove | Remove from comparison | Remove from comparison |
1. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Premium2. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Lowcost
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Exemplary2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Exemplary
1. Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Satisfactory2. Pirelli Scorpion Winter Satisfactory
Name | Wet | Dry | Snow | Ice | Noise | Wear | Fuel consumption |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Best values in test | 2,1 | 2,0 | 1,9 | 2,3 | 3,1 | 0,5 | 1,4 |
Fulda Kristall Control HP2 Rating: Satisfactory | 2,5 | 2,4 | 2,9 | 2,5 | 3,3 | 1,5 | 1,6 |
Pirelli Scorpion Winter Rating: Satisfactory | 2,1 | 2,1 | 2,7 | 2,7 | 3,6 | 2,5 | 2,8 |
Show test details |