• 7 shops, 90 283 products

Comparison: Firestone Winterhawk 3 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP51

In this comparison, we are comparing a tyre from a manufacturer from USA (Firestone) against a tyre from a manufacturer from South Korea (Kumho). Generally, Firestone winter tyres are slightly better rated (72%) than Kumho (68%). In this particular case, the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 has a better rating of 68% compared to 61% of the Firestone Winterhawk 3. Important for this comparison is also the Autobild 2018 195/65 R15 test, where both the Winterhawk 3 and the WinterCraft WP51 were tested. See more mutual tests below. When it comes to comparison, eu labels can be also interesting - 92% of Firestone Winterhawk 3 dimensions has C wet grip rating. Most (98%) of the Kumho WinterCraft WP51 also have C wet ratings.

# Firestone Winterhawk 3
/61%
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
/68%

Add to comparison

DimensionsR13 - R18 R13 - R17
Price
RemoveRemove from comparisonRemove from comparison

Add to comparison

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,327
Firestone Winterhawk 338,227,8
Kumho WinterCraft WP5138,828
Show test details
Name WetDrySnowIceNoiseWearFuel consumption
Best values in test1,81,71,72,13,01,51,7
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: Satisfactory
3,12,12,92,53,42,51,8
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Rating: Satisfactory
3,32,42,62,43,62,52,3
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test34,225
Firestone Winterhawk 339,827,5
Kumho WinterCraft WP5141,0
Show test details
Name Stopping distance on wetStopping distance on snow
Best values in test36,827,7
Firestone Winterhawk 341,928,9
Kumho WinterCraft WP5142,530,2
Show test details
Name Points totalWetDrySnow
Best values in test415144136144
Firestone Winterhawk 3
Rating: -
338100112136
Kumho WinterCraft WP51
Rating: -
338107111120
Show test details